Search for: "Murray v. Murray"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2012, 3:22 am
– Ed) Tods Murray’s Lexcel award comes amid a crop of other similar lapel pins & certificates handed out to solicitors recently, as part of a somewhat obvious desperate attempt by both Scottish & English industry regulators to drum up business for ailing law firms which have become infamous for battles with their clients such as the Tods Murray v Arakin where pensioner Mr McNamara has been appealing a ruling by law firm favourite judge Lord Woolman he… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
Murray placed 13 stints in his heart for free. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
The case of Tods Murray v Arakin and Mr McNamara’s position as a “Vexatious Litigant” featured in the Sunday Herald : A-courting we will go ... [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
As I posted earlier, in Murray, et al v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
A jury convicted Murray Hammer of injury to a child, P.H. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:31 pm
From Businesswire: LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana captioned Hunter v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:59 pm
From Businesswire 4/14/2020: LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey captioned Vitiello v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:40 pm
O'Hair was the plaintiff in Murray v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
In the 1950s, her legal scholarship helped Thurgood Marshall challenge segregation head-on in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am
LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP (“GPM”) announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada captioned Chowdhury v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 12:10 pm
Instead, he cited Geduldig v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:12 pm
Murray and Shaw NYT Oped: In Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:03 pm
Murray was awarded $3,244.21 in benefits. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:01 am
In this latest podcast I’m joined by Philip Henson, Partner at Bargate Murray Solicitors to chew over the new and proposed reforms to employment law and the case of Seldon v Clarkson, Wright & Jakes. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
In Murray v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 3:06 am
In the case of Bolton v Stoltenberg [2018] NSWSC 1518 a former mayor of Narrabri Shire Council has been awarded $100,000 in damages by the NSW Supreme Court after a “ratepayer activist” was found to have defamed him on a Facebook page in a “hectoring … bullying … high handed” tone. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
Our right to free expression has a natural tension with our right to privacy – see Von Hannover, Campbell v MGN or Mosley v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
