Search for: "NELSON v. JONES"
Results 41 - 60
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 6:39 am
These sales were etched in traders’ memories when the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell almost 1,000 points in just 30 minutes. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:39 am
Nelson dissented, arguing that the defining of the dangerous weapon used as the prison made knife undercut the burden the government had.U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
Described as “America’s Nelson Mandela,” his Equal Justice Initiative, a non-profit law firm based in Alabama, is dedicated to challenging racial injustice and ending mass incarceration. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
Nelson. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 9:30 pm
Jones, and Trevor Morrison. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:25 am
Jones, No. 06-30024 (1-10-07). [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
Jones (which set forth the “effects test”) and Mavrix Photo v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:05 am
Roberts, An Alternative Theory of Burwell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Bell, Marbury v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:29 pm
Commentary comes from Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Libby Nelson of Vox, and Mark Joseph Stern of Slate, who also covered today’s opinion in Green v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On Monday, the Court declined to hear three environmental cases, writes Gabriel Nelson of Greenwire (posted at the Times). [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 12:34 pm
Jones, No. 114,601 (Sedgwick)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Kristen B. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:33 pm
Speaking of Twitter, we broke the news today of the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:06 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
”But twenty-five states still continue to have laws on the books that allow for life without parole sentences for juvenile offenders.Just last year, in Jones v Mississippi, the Supreme Court refused to go beyond Miller. [read post]
