Search for: "NFL Productions, LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 10:02 am
NFL, 89 F.R.D. 497, 499 (C.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
If the products or services are illegal under federal law then, use of the mark will not be lawful in commerce. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm
If the products or services are illegal under federal law then, use of the mark will not be lawful in commerce. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
’” Moreover, the comparison to NFL and NASCAR used by the dissenting judge was not raised before the OSHRC. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:47 pm
Doesn’t show much confidence in the product does it? [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Tran Enterprises, LLC (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:56 pm
The Oakland Raiders are a NFL football team that plays in — you guessed it — Oakland, CA. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:03 am
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles US LLC et alia, and Gamboa et alia v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Shell Oil Products Company; Shell Oil Products Company v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
& Tax Code section 23101 and its intricate NFL-like regulations. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
& Tax Code section 23101 and its intricate NFL-like regulations. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
General Foam Plastics Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court Kansas: Third Party infringers have no standing to challenge assignment: KMMentor, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:36 pm
Although Carter feigned ignorance, attributing the low quality to mass production, the judge didn’t buy it. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 pm
Accordingly, Coix filed the Coix Health, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Lexington Coal Company, LLC Issue: Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding that administrative-expense priority does not extend to all payments due under a contract entered or assumed by the debtor during a bankruptcy case and in holding that a creditor’s claim against a bankruptcy estate arises only when the creditor’s right to payment accrues under state law. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Sheppard Mullin pending before the CAFC (Patently-O) (Patents Post Grant Blog) Nike – Motion to transfer venue granted: Factors favored transfer & plaintiff’s location ‘recent, ephemeral’: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
Capitol Records, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
" And she is spot-on that the case law on tying suggests Section 1 even applies when a seller exploits its control over a product and "[t]he buyer plays no role beyond purchasing the goods under conditions set by the seller. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
And finally in January, the owners of 'Grumpy Cat' successfully took action against the unlicensed use of Grumpy Cat’s image on iced coffee products branded as ‘Grumppucions’ for ‘blatantly infringing’ their copyrights and trademarks by selling other types of coffee and T-shirts with the cat’s image. [read post]
