Search for: "Nanni v. A " Results 41 - 60 of 282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Louis Police Department and the county prosecutor for not pursuing criminal charges against the nanny. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:22 pm by Ana Muñoz
  Work of a domestic nature within a household, includes but is not limited to: “(i) housekeeping; (ii) house cleaning; (iii) home management; (iv) nanny services; (v) caretaking of individuals in the home, including sick, convalescing and elderly individuals; (vi) laundering; (vii) cooking; (viii) home companion services; and (ix) other household services for members of households or their guests in private homes. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Harris v Harris, 2020 NY Slip Op 31570(U) [Supreme Court, New York County Apr. 23, 2020], Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Nanny M. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:23 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
., individuals who employ household employees such as nannies or housekeepers); (iii) an owner of 20% or more of the equity of the applicant is incarcerated, on probation, on parole; presently subject to an indictment, criminal information, arraignment, or other means by which formal criminal charges are brought in any jurisdiction; or has been convicted of a felony within the last five years; or (iv) the applicant has obtained a direct or guaranteed loan from the SBA or any other federal… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The presumption against residential licensees The law on this stems from a famous case from 1988 called Street v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:35 am by Beth Kivelä
The law relating to pre-nuptial agreements has developed following the Supreme Court decision in Radmacher v Granatino in 2010. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Thus far, the press has successfully argued that anything more than self-regulation would reduce them to Pravda-esque publications, doing the bidding of the Nanny state Government that would otherwise regulate them. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As this judgment includes the extracurricular and nanny expenses at issue in the second cause of action, it represents a new and material fact that warrants renewal. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Giles Peaker
Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd (2019) EWCA Civ 1334 The Court of Appeal considers the effect of an admitted breach of the Public Sector Equality Duty under s.149 Equality Act 2010 on possession proceedings. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Though they argued that the text was a privileged marital communication, that issue did not need to be resolved at this stage since the nanny plausibly alleged the couple’s intent to discriminate by asserting that the wife explicitly told her she was being terminated because their outgoing nanny who did not do the job properly was African-American and that they expected the plaintiff to be Filipino (Maurice v. [read post]