Search for: "Nardini v. Nardini"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2021, 6:08 am
That principle kills off this case.The case is Perez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:42 am
For various reasons, there is no case here, the Court of Appeals says.The case is Heidel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Here, the excessive force claim will go to trial, but the false arrest is dismissed on immunity grounds.The case is Williams v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
The case is Malarczyk v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am
This case once again shows how qualified immunity works in police misconduct cases.The case is Williams v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:49 am
The case is Thomas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:39 am
The Court holds that, in requiring her to remove the hijab in the presence of a man outside of her family, DOCCS subjected her to an adverse action in violation of Title VII's prohibition against religious discrimination.The case is Billings v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:38 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Bjorklund v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 6:51 am
The case is King v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeals vacates the fine.The case is Walsh v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:08 am
This case highlights how it all works.The case is Stafford v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals (Menashi and Nardini) reverses.How can the Court of Appeals reverse in light of the Arcara injunction? [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:44 am
Bush), Sullivan (Trump), Bianco (Trump), Park (Trump), Nardini (Trump) and Menashi (Trump). [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
That legislative amendment helps the plaintiff in this case, as the Second Circuit reverses summary judgment because the plaintiff's tendonitis is a disability under the Act.The case is Greenbaum v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:12 am
Consider this case.The case is Hampton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:22 am
The district court erred in dismissing these allegations of direct observations as “conclusory,” SPA 31Sce v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
" The Circuit cites Adams v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:58 am
Under Supreme Court authority, i.e., Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:54 am
The case is Hayes v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:57 am
A White colleague, Henzel, made racial comments, summarized by the Court of Appeals (Nardini, Perez and Park) as follows:While Milord-Francois was a Senior Attorney, Henzel once loudly asked Milord-Francois if she was “getting drugs in there? [read post]
