Search for: "Nate Anderson, Ars Technica"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2010, 7:15 pm
But if they're going to argue that ACTA would change existing US law, they're not going to find evidence of that in this leaked draft -- or, as far as I can tell, anywhere else.Update: Read Nate Anderson's piece in Ars Technica, which similarly concludes that the draft "simply reflects existing US law. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
"Nate Anderson at ars technica goes into the legal details in his French court savages "three-strikes" law, tosses it out, pointing out that a critical flaw in the Three Strikes Law was the fact that the USER had to prove that he had not illegally engaged in file-sharing in order to retain his or her threatened cut-off from Internet access:"[B]ut the burden of proof was on the Internet user....In its ruling [.pdf here (in French)], this was… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:30 pm
" Nate Anderson, Ars Technica, Apple loses big in DRM ruling: jailbreaks are "fair use" "This time, the Library went (comparatively) nuts, allowing widespread bypassing of the CSS encryption on DVDs, declaring iPhone jailbreaking to be 'fair use,' and letting consumers crack their legally purchased e-books in order to have them read aloud by computers. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
" Nate Anderson, Ars Technica, ISPs react, sort of support network neutrality—with caveats: "In one important sense, the 'openness' advocates have already won the first round of the debate: the way the issue is framed. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
” Nate Anderson of Ars Technica translated: It took Sarkozy only minutes to go from extolling the “third globalization” brought about by Internet companies — after the Age of Exploration and the Industrial Revolution — to delivering a parental lecture about “responsibility”… In Sarkozy’s view, the dominant need right now is for control over this amazing, but rambunctious, resource we call the… [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:12 am
” * Nate Anderson of Ars Technica took a deep look at a child porn sting operation [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 12:20 pm
An article yesterday by Nate Anderson on Ars Technica tells a very worrisome tale. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:25 pm
Legal IssuesResearcher: Optimal copyright term is 14 years from Ars Technica (by Nate Anderson)"A Cambridge researcher says that, according to economic calculations, the ideal length of time for copyright protection is a mere 14 years. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:31 am
"ars technica "the art of technology" is a group blog and one of the best blogs on the Internet, so that you should take a look at it if you do not know it. ars technica writes "Germany's Constitutional Court ruled this week that access to e-mail and phone records should only be granted in serious investigations. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It has been established at common law and recognized by our courts that “rules attending property must keep pace with its increase and improvements and must be adapted to every case”, and copyright protection must correspondingly extend. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
Hylton, Punitive damages and the economic theory of penalties, Georgetown Law Journal, November 1998).As written at ars technica by Nate Anderson, the French company Alcatel, which is "in the process of merging with Lucent", [link added by LawPundit] and which some months ago sued Cisco for patent infringement, has just sued Microsoft for patent infringement of digital video and communication network patents, asking for triple damages for what is… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
The Need for Authorization Nate Anderson of Ars Technica, who did a great service in running side-by-side the provisions in the FCC’s final Order and the terms of Verizon-Google’s proposed legislative framework, asks the key question, “Why is Verizon suing over net neutrality rules it once supported? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
A funny thing happens when one reads about how “content industries hate technology. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
by Paul Alan Levy We have previously blogged about the crucial role played by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act in protecting the ability of consumers to speak effectively about corporate or political wrongdoing, by protecting the hosts of web sites and email services from being sued over the contents of communications that are made using their services. [read post]
