Search for: "Nathan v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
As discussed here, if considered satire, not parody, Dumb Starbucks could be liable for infringement (Dr Seuss Enterprises v Penguin Books USA (1997)).It seems unlikely that adding DUMB- provides enough distinction for it to avoid being considered an unauthorised derivative of Starbucks’ copyrighted works. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
Nathan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
-M.Th.D. ten Napel, Leiden Law School, Institute for Public Law, Section of Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Netherlands, “Religious Pluralism, Eastern Ethnical Monism and Western ‘Civic Totalism’” Nicolae V. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Here’s his statement in Politics USA. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
Human Rights, Subjectivity and the Potential of Narrative Maggie Werner, Hobart & William: Heroes v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm
The legal communication papers being presented at RSA 2012: The 15th Rhetoric Society of America Biennial Conference, being held 25-28 May 2012, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, are listed below. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gobain Ceramics v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Nathan Burkan, who was quoted at the beginning of this post, represented the Music Publishers’ Association. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am
Fields, Martinez v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
” At USA Today, Joan Biskupic has an interview with Justice Ginsburg, who – among other things – expresses the belief that the majority’s decision in Connick v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 pm
"Castle" remains what it is -- a star vehicle for Nathan Fillion. [read post]
2 May 2011, 7:30 am
Nathan R. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
In the second, Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
In the second, Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
News & Analysis 10864-10886 (2010).Richardson, Nathan. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:48 am
Go back to this post from August about United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Nathan Burney, a former prosecutor, deals with the excuses. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
