Search for: "National Labor Relations Board v. Lewis"
Results 41 - 60
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 9:09 am
For over 75 years, she said, the National Labor Relations Board has held that the NLRA safeguards employees from employer interference when they pursue joint, collective, and class suits related to the conditions of their employment. [read post]
30 May 2018, 11:00 am
Lewis (one of a trio of cases, the others being National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 11:07 am
Starting in 2012, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decided on multiple occasions that class action waivers incorporated in arbitration agreements violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) because it prevented employees from engaging in certain actions which are explicitly allowed under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:49 am
In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Gorsuch, the Court concluded that neither the FAA's savings clause nor the National LAblor Relations Act (as interpreted by the National Labor Relations Board) renders such clauses unenforceable. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:01 am
Morris and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:01 am
Morris and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:00 am
”* In contrast, Justice Ginsburg’s dissent frames the issue as “Does the [FAA] permit employers to insist that their employees, whenever seeking redress for commonly experienced wage loss, go it alone, never mind the right secured to employees by the National Labor Relations Act . . . [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:37 am
In 2012, however, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that requiring employees to sign arbitration agreements waiving their rights to pursue class and collective actions in all forums violated the NLRA and should not be enforced (D.R. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:01 am
Supreme Court held that arbitration agreements with class action waivers do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:16 am
Stephen Morris et al. and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:30 pm
In 2012 the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruled that such waivers violated the rights of employees who were covered by the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit and the National Labor Relations Board had held, to the contrary, that to compel workers to forgo their right to litigate or arbitrate their statutory employment claims on a collective basis was unlawful because it contravened their right to engage in collective activity for mutual aid and protection under the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:29 am
overturns the position of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and resolves a split among federal courts of appeals. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:46 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am
Epic Systems v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:56 am
And the National Labor Relations Board agreed. [read post]
22 May 2018, 2:06 pm
Lewis, 584 U.S. ____ (2018), holding that mandatory employer-sponsored arbitration agreements do not offend the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:17 pm
Until very recently, neither the National Labor Relations Board nor labor organizations contended that individualized arbitration proceedings interfered with employee rights to engage in Section 7 “concerted activities. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:51 am
Concepcion, the National Labor Relations Board advanced a novel interpretation of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives employees the right to organize, bargain collectively and “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:18 am
Morris, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
