Search for: "National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Forest Service" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Keith Rizzardi
 For all of the foregoing reasons and the studies and authorities relied on by Defendants, the Court concludes that Defendants have not violated the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, the National Park Service Organic Act, or the Yellowstone Enabling Act, and that the requisites for injunctive relief have not been proven. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
Fish and Wildlife Service Protects Northern Long-eared Bat as Threatened Under Endangered Species Act - The U.S. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:46 am by WIMS
<> Collin O'Mara Appointed President and CEO of National Wildlife Federation - "Collin is a tireless leader with a deep understanding of conservation issues and a strong, entrepreneurial. . . [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
In December 2003, respondent Earth Island Institute and several other environmental groups filed a complaint in federal district court against the Forest Service, challenging the legality of the Burnt Ridge Project and - both facially and as applied to the Project - the 2003 Forest Service regulations. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm by Steve Davies
The “joint counterpart” regulations were issued by six federal agencies — BLM, the Fish and Wildlife Service and National Park Service, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs in the Department of the Interior; the Forest Service (in USDA), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (or NOAA Fisheries) in the Department of Commerce. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
As of March 24, 2000, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the lynx as a threatened species. 65 Fed. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
Forest Service proposed a rule to allow the agency to review proposals for carbon capture and storage programs on National Forest System lands. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm by Holly Doremus
The issue in this case was whether the Forest Service was required by section 7 of the ESA to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. [read post]