Search for: "Nederlander v Nederlander"
Results 41 - 60
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 7:03 am
De Hoge Raad mag zich erover uitlaten Eerst een stukje Nederlands recht. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:29 am
Zie voor een kwestie die in Nederland speelde: Hof Arnhem-Leeuwarden 20 januari 2015 (ECLI:NL:GHARL:2015:302). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S, a decision where the CJEU addressed the trade mark absolute grounds of “substantial value” and “shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves”. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S was decided on 18 September, but this Kat -- who has been beset by a succession of happy distractions -- has only just got round to writing it up for the weblog. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm
” Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Leeuwarden) 20 maart 2013 (ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2013:BZ5002): “Vast staat dat de bank op basis van artikel 5 van de algemene voorwaarden behorende bij de euriborleningen bevoegd was de individuele opslag (van 0,8%) te verhogen. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:17 pm
Met zijn onderneming is hij in een bepaalde regio in Nederland actief. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Soms dient zich een bijzonder geval aan, zoals de zaak die speelde voor de President van de Rechtbank Amsterdam (23 april 1992; rolnummer KG 92/847 V). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:58 am
Canoro Resources v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:24 pm
(Europe) Ltd v Inter-Zuid Transport BV (case C452/12). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Mrs Smith pointed out that, even if a trade mark was more than simply descriptive and in principle could be registered, it would not actually be eligible for registration if the mark failed to designate the origin of the product.The best club cardIn assessing whether a trade mark is distinctive and hence does not come within s.3(1)(b), the two-step process laid down by the CJEU in Case C-363/99 Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Postkantoor) was adopted by the… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
In the meantime, here they are in outline:Case C‑443/12, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Sanofi, Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb SNC intervening, noted on The SPC Blog here. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:39 pm
Such was the holding of the Appellate Division, First Department, in its January 3, 2013 decision in Nederlander v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
Most recently, UTO Nederland BV v Tilaknagar Industries Ltd [Bom HC 2011], briefly discussed the concepts of quality control and licensing. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:42 am
One such case is Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega S.A. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:10 am
Related posts:Issue 2012.1 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht Issue 2012.2 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht Issue 2011.1 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 12:41 am
Nederlander Producing Co. of Am., Inc., NY Slip Op 04685 (1st Dept. 2012). [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:02 am
The author uses the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the House of Lord’s decision in OFT v Lloyds to illustrate the argument. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:52 am
‘De notie van wereldrecht vóór, tijdens, en na de oprichting van de Verenigde Naties,’ Nederlands Juristenblad, special issue on ‘65 Jaar Wereldrecht,’ 2010. [read post]
