Search for: "Neighborhood Legal Services v. Legal Services Corp."
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm
New Process Steel Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
The Second District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles has ruled that banks are “legally bound by their loan modification promises,” and can be sued for fraud when homeowners rely on such promises and are damaged as a result. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
In the now famous case, Poletown Neighborhood Council v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
There’s also one neighborhood in Rockingham. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
