Search for: "New v. New" Results 41 - 60 of 185,295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 1:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Elien Verniers, Strasbourg Observers: Executief van de Moslims van België and Others v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
" For thus the Romans who wish to avoid words of ill omen indicate death.The post You Say "Unalive," He Says "Vixerunt": Everything Old Is New Again appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Harnack, 2022 IL App (1st) 210143 Contempt is when “[a] party who understands the court’s order but chooses to ignore the mandate” Killion v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
In confronting increased collaboration by global authoritarian actors and their regional allies, the development of diverse civil society-led coalitions and new skill sets focused on highlighting and countering authoritarian influence is critical. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
Anteau, “The Northern District of Illinois v. the Internet: How Chicago Became the Center of Schedule A Trademark Infringement Litigation”; Law.Com, December 19, 2023. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:45 am by Unknown
"Mandated economic self-sufficiency from state and refugee perspectives: refugee integration policy and practice in Sweden and New Zealand," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Latest Articles, 1 May 2024 [open access] Plan Nacional de Reasentamiento y Vías Complementarias de Admisión a la República Argentina para personas refugiadas, apátridas y necesitadas de protección internacional (Comisión Nacional Para Los… [read post]
The post US Supreme Court upholds civil forfeiture without immediate hearing appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of New York (EEOC v. [read post]