Search for: "Newman v. Downing" Results 41 - 60 of 281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Second, the judgment in Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 437. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Newman, 959 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2020): In a software case using the abstraction, filtration, comparison approach, the burden of proof on the protectability of what was copied is on the defendant in the filtration analysis, not on the plaintiff. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 3 December 2020 permission to appeal was granted in the case of Newman v Southampton CC. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Yet today’s exemptions seekers, as well as some of the justices, bristle at the comparison to the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in Newman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 5 August 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd  [2020] EWHC 2160 (Ch) (heard 29 July 2020). [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
Background The rule against reflective loss The rule that “reflective loss” cannot be recovered has its origins in Prudential Insurance Co Limited v Newman Industries Limited (No 2) [1982] Ch 204. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:48 am by INFORRM
The High Court handed down judgment on Friday in Newman v Southampton City Council & Ors [2020] EWHC 2103 (Fam), the first recorded judgment concerning journalistic access to the court file in public law family proceedings. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1982] Ch 204 laid down a rule of company law: a diminution in the value of a shareholding or in distributions to shareholders, which is merely the result of a loss suffered by the company in consequence of a wrong done to it by the defendant, is not in the eyes of the law damage which is separate and distinct from the damage suffered by the company, and is therefore not recoverable. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am by Stan Gibson and Jessica Newman
Mar. 25, 2013). [4] Id. [5] Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., 197 Cal.App.2d 331. [6] See, e.g., Jegen v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
In this post, Alaina Wadsworth and Sophie Newman, who both work within the insurance and reinsurance group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:33 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Ever since the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 14 November 2019 Saini J handed down judgment in ABC v Google LLC [2019] EWHC 3020 (QB) refusing the still anonymous claimant relief from sanctions. [read post]