Search for: "No Defendant - Entered for Statistical Purposes Only"
Results 41 - 60
of 287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Defendant Trane has not shown that the representative sample needs expanding to all class members for discovery purposes. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
Both plaintiffs and defendant below had submitted expert evidence of the results of statistical analyses performed by their respective labor economists. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 10:51 pm
Through the RJA, the 2009 General Assembly affirmatively sought to allow the review of statistical evidence that the Supreme Court had not allowed in McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), which requires plaintiffs pleading claims based on antitrust conspiracies to include detailed factual allegations supporting the assertion that the defendants entered into an unlawful agreement, and Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:10 am
As can be appreciated from this case, USPTO statistics on claim confirmation in patent reexamination only tell part of the story. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:55 pm
In spite of all the resources and assets we earn, the vast majority of Americans with assets do not take the time to create a Will.National statistics indicate that 80% of Americans die without leaving a Will. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Enter the Stephens-Davidowitz study. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Enter the Stephens-Davidowitz study. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
Since the defendant had neither sought permission from the couple to use their photograph, nor been authorized to do so by the plaintiff, the court held it liable not only for infringement of the plaintiff’s copyright in the advertisement, but also for misappropriation of the couple’s personality rights. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
Jeopardy continues after a mistrial, and the State’s entry of a voluntary dismissal under G.S. 15A-931 after jeopardy has attached terminates jeopardy in the defendant’s favor, regardless of the reason the State gives for entering the dismissal. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
The FTC also offered a statistical sampling of 48 customer calls to defendants, provided by defendants, showing consumer confusion over the terms. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
These exemptions include the following: Section 52: where personal data is held by an individual and is concerned only with the management of his/her personal, family, or household affairs, or held only for recreational purposes. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
[Footnote 29] Statistics, at most, may show only a likelihood that a particular factor entered into some decisions. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
(I'm oversimplifying a lot; but for purposes of this post that's not significant.)First, the statistics didn't prove that McCleskey himself was sentenced to die because he was black and had killed whites. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
That, however, was only one half the equaton. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
The court described that policy approvingly, stating that “[o]n its face, Defendant’s policy appears reasonable and suitably tailored to its purpose of ensuring an honest work force. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:23 pm
The broad definition used by the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program developed by Clemson and sanctioned by the South Carolina Association of School Administrators is “when someone repeatedly and on purpose says or does mean or hurtful things to another person who has a hard time defending himself or herself. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Where the address of either party and any child or children is unknown and not a matter of public record, or is subject to an existing confidentiality order pursuant to DRL section 254 or FCA section 154-b, such applications may be brought in the county where the judgment was entered; and it is further(4) Additional Requirement with Respect to Uncontested and Contested Judgments of Divorce. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
Could the plaintiffs have proved that the defendant schools were engaging in race-based affirmative action? [read post]
