Search for: "Nolan v. Nolan" Results 41 - 60 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 2:39 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Today, the same court denied his application to hold his case for the Supreme Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hutchings-Whelan v Hutchings [2012] EWCA Civ 38 (26 January 2012) D v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 39 (31 January 2012) Annison v Nolan [2012] EWCA Civ 54 (31 January 2012) Revenue and Customs v The GKN Group [2012] EWCA Civ 57 (31 January 2012) Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd & Ors v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24 (31 January 2012) Barrett v Bem &… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:13 am by scanner1
Nolan DA 16-0741 2019 MT 177N Criminal – Assault on Peace Officer/Judicial Officer State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:22 pm by alex
Nolan Shutler, Taking the Bitter with the Sweet: Wenatchi Fishing Rights, 41 Environmental Law Review 987 (2011) This Chapter examines the Ninth Circuit’s 2010 Decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nolan & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 671 (04 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Solicitors Regulation Authority v Lawrence & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 421 (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (30 March 2012) Aziz v Lim [2012] EWHC 915 (QB) (05 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Rouse Tout A Tout, R (on the… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”An action to recover damages for legal malpractice must be commenced within three years after the accrual of the cause of action” (Bullfrog, LLC v Nolan, 102 AD3d 719, 719-720; see CPLR 214[6]). [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 5:06 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal in the Elaine Nolan, George Phillips, Elisabeth Ruccia, Paul Carter, R.A. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 71 The Supreme Court dismissed the USA’s appeal by a majority of 4:1 regarding their obligations under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULCRA), s188, during the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
This judgment concerns the failure on the part of the appellant to consult an employee representative when proposing to dismiss the respondent. [read post]