Search for: "North et al v. United States of America"
Results 41 - 60
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
On October 31, the European Union and the United States agreed on temporary measures to settle their dispute over US Section 232 national security tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm
(Law professor Helen Alvaré et al. note that women’s representation in professional fields, as in public service, has increased at the same time as a prolonged decline in the U.S. abortion rate.) [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am
Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 2:05 pm
Volvo Penta of the Americas, Inc.[13]H & H Marine Engine Service Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
AbbVie Inc., et al., No. 14-5151 (E.D. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
Treaty between the United States and the Comanche, Aionai (Hainai), Anadarko, Caddo, et al., Signed at Council Springs, Robinson County, Texas, near the Brazos River, May 15, 1846. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/175516196 Senate’s Advice and Consent to Treaty Ratification with Amendments, February 15, 1847. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/175516197 Instrument of Ratification Signed by President James K. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
Les Québécoises et les Québécois forment une nation. [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:44 am
V. et al. (2005). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
North Star Innovations, Inc., No. 20-679; Iancu v. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
Rather, the real winner is a growing cohort of lawyers who are filing meritless lawsuits in federal and state courts across the United States every time a merger or acquisition is announced or a corporate misfortune impacts a company’s share price… In the last five years, half of the nearly $23 billion in securities claims costs have gone to lawyers — both plaintiff and defense.[4] Since 2017, the plaintiffs’ bar has expanded their corporate… [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
BP PLC, et al.). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
The U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
Russel Covington, et al v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Initially, the NBAM covers eight states: California, Utah, Minnesota, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, Massachusetts, and Maine. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
The BroadbandUSA Newsletter for September includes notable state news from Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Wisconsin (among others). [read post]
