Search for: "Novell v. Microsoft" Results 41 - 60 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 10:24 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The rapid spread of the novel coronavirus and the disease it causes, COVID-19, is sparking new calls for paid sick leave, and employers are beginning to heed the call. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm by Florian Mueller
I just wrote about it in the previous post (the first one of a series of three posts on FTC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of  Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of  Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 11:07 am by Jonathan Bailey
This gives ownership to the person using the tool, much like how it’s the author, not Microsoft, that holds the copyright to a novel written in Word. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
At Microsoft, Surface/X-box designers/engineers had very different structures. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, December 3, 2019, at 9:45 a.m.: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hold a hearing on the future of U.S. policy toward Russia. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am by Florian Mueller
For example, one of our members sought to develop a novel drone device (and associated software platform) for firefighting agencies, which would have enabled firefighters to monitor and address dangerous conditions. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am by Gordon Ahl
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Wednesday, November 13, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.: The House Permanent Select Committee will hold the first public hearing of the impeachment inquiry. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg  Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Commentary by Chris Sprigman, NYU School of Law: Microsoft antitrust litigation was how he started to learn ©: Microsoft’s argument was that it owned the © so nothing it could do with the © could violate antitrust law. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Amicus Briefs all side with GoogleIn its brief, Microsoft criticised the Federal Court of Appeals for taking an unduly narrow view of fair use in its decision by granting “functional code the same level of copyright protection as creative expression in a novel”. [read post]