Search for: "OKLAHOMA v. MURPHY"
Results 41 - 60
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 3:43 pm
A typical judicial opinion reads:People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Murphy, which was pending before the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Murphy, which was pending before the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:35 am
Murphy (later Sharp v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
Murphy (McGirt v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 6:59 am
Murphy and McGirt v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
First up was Trump v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
Murphy (now called Sharp v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:58 am
Murphy (formerly Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:26 am
Although an employer was victorious on summary judgment, its request for attorneys’ fees under the ADA and Sec. 1927 was rejected after a federal district court found that an EEOC determination letter concluding the employer discriminated against an employee provided a reasonable, non-frivolous basis for her lawsuit (Murphy v Samson Resources Co, June 21, 2013, Frizzell, G). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:35 am
Murphy (Tribal Jurisdiction; Indian Reservation Boundaries) on 2/6/18. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Murphy (Tribal Jurisdiction; Indian Reservation Boundaries) on 2/6/18. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Murphy (Tribal Jurisdiction; Indian Reservation Boundaries) on 2/6/18. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
That's what today's decision in King v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” Sean Murphy and Jessica Gresko of the Associated Press report that the decision “means that Oklahoma prosecutors lack the authority to pursue criminal cases against American Indian defendants in parts of Oklahoma that include most of Tulsa, the state’s second-largest city. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
Facts: This case (Murphy v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Murphy (Reservation Boundaries) on 5/21/18. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am
Caldera v. [read post]
