Search for: "OREGON STATE EMPLOYES ASSOCIATION v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
However, there are no federal standards for state workers’ compensation programs, and there are considerable differences among the states in the level of benefits, the coverage of employers and employees, and the rules used to determine which disabled workers are eligible for benefits. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:53 am
Oregon Department of Agriculture et al"The class-of-one theory of equal protection does not apply in the public-employment context. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
District Court for the District of Oregon 2013). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
See Indiana Heart Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 12:36 pm
In recent years, other states (Oregon, Minnesota, Connecticut, and Maine) have enacted captive audience bans. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:19 pm
Oregon Dept. of Agricultural, and Ricci v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:41 am
The case, Rizo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:41 am
The case, Rizo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 8:17 pm
V. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:57 pm
” According to the Final Rule, vertical joint employment exists where the employee has an employment relationship with one employer, e.g., a staffing agency or subcontractor, whereas horizontal joint employment exists where the employee has employment relationships with multiple and related or associated employers. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:03 am
The science on this point is indisputable, and our federal government has admitted as much in filings made in the Oregon federal court case of Juliana v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:42 am
” Although the Ninth Circuit bought this argument in Oregon Restaurant & Lodging Ass’n v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-154 Title: Florida Association of Professional Lobbyists, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:37 am
Finding partial error in the federal magistrate judge’s order on the issue, a federal district court in Oregon granted in part the employee’s motion for sanctions (Schedler v. [read post]
