Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel Supreme Court of Ohio"
Results 41 - 60
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
OEHHA wasted no time after the Supreme Court’s decision adding glyphosate to the list on July 7, 2017. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court decision in Ohio v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:00 pm
City of Berkeley, California 17-976 Issues: (1) Whether–when the Supreme Court held in Zauderer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
An Ohio Supreme Court Justice judge has been charged by Special Disciplinary Counsel with ethics violations that include hearing cases brought by the office of his State Attorney General father. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio that limited factual disclosures serve the state’s interest in protecting the public from misleading and deceptive commercial speech. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am
Interestingly, the Supreme Court of Ohio has a very light docket from now until the end of this year. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:48 am
Supreme Court held in Weingarten that employees may request the presence of a union representative at an investigatory interview when the employee reasonably believes the interview may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:39 am
Supreme Court held that employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement may request the presence of a union representative during an investigatory interview that the employee reasonably believes may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Yet the Supreme Court in Near rejected the injunction. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
What would we have called Antonin Scalia if he had resigned his seat on the Supreme Court to run for Vice President with Bob Dole in 1996, as he was reportedly urged to do? [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:38 am
Supreme Court held that employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement may request the presence of a union representative during an investigatory interview that the employee reasonably believes may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:38 am
Supreme Court held that employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement may request the presence of a union representative during an investigatory interview that the employee reasonably believes may result in disciplinary action. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:49 am
Accordingly, it vacated the award.The City appealed and the Connecticut Supreme Court unanimously reversed. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Joseph M. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 1:47 pm
Supreme Court precedent, government employees have a First Amendment right to speak as private citizens on matters of public concern. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
This post examines an opinion the Supreme Court of Ohioissued recently in a lawyer disciplinary proceeding: Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
On July 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Foley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am
Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985) (“The use of illustrations or pictures in advertisements serves important communicative functions: it attracts the attention of the audience to the advertiser’s message, and it may also serve to impart information directly. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:02 pm
This post examines an opinion from the Ohio Supreme Court: Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
