Search for: "Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes" Results 41 - 60 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Use of a mark in a company name results in a finding of “instrument of fraud”, just like for domain namesBayerische Motoren Werke v BMW Telecommunications Limited, Benjamin Michael Whitehouse [2019] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2019)Benjamin Michael Whitehouse has the initials BMW. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
Details were leaked to the press last week with the Mail on Sunday saying that it was “press regulation by the back door”. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  The report said that Fin4 was targeting the email accounts of top executives, lawyers and others in an effort to obtain non-public information about merger and acquisition deals and major market-moving announcements. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
Consider a recent exemplar, in which he contradicted himself in back-to-back sentences. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society Gazette has a comment on the case of Reid v Newsquest entitled “High Court backs lawyers’ ‘hatchet job’ lible claim”. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 21 February 2018, Dingemans J handed down judgment on a preliminary issue on meaning in the case of Bukova v Associated Newspapers [2018] EWHC 320 (QB)). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
When historians look back at the copyright worlf in 2017 (if our attention spans allow us to have roles such as a 'historian' in the future!) [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Until these conceptual issues are considered the regulation of economic activates—SOEs, supply chains, multinational corporations, will remain elusive. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It has been suggested that Pakistani digital network ARY is planning to return to the UK market a few weeks after it was banned by the media regulator Office of Communications (Ofcom) over violation of broadcasting codes. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
Courts Regulating the Regulators Monday, April 25, 2016  | Christopher J. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:18 am by Ben
Their argument was that it was money they got back from Buma and it doesn’t matter to them where it comes from, as it’s not part of the show’s settlement. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, heard 1, 2 and 6 July 2015 (Haddon-Cave J). [read post]