Search for: "Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2008, 8:57 am
Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co., 110 F.R.D. 557, 560-68 (S.D.N.Y. 1986); A.B.A. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) (“A claim for legal malpractice is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the mistakes of counsel. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
A legal malpractice cause of action “is viable, despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that settlement of the action was effectively compelled by the [*2]mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
Magdalena Tavella, Andres Horacio Ficicchia, Gonzalo Garcia Blaya, Lucia Mariana Hernando, Cecilia de Lorenzo, Adriana Rosa Bagattin, Daniella Patricia Goldman, Mariano Pablo Ferrari, Mariano Graciarena, and Fernando LoureyroCase number: 13-cv-04609 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 3, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 9, 2015 2/27/2015 5/28/2015 2015-16 In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:50 pm
First Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Oppenheim & Co., 160 A.D.2d 428, 554 N.Y.S.2d 487, 489-90 (N.Y. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:36 am
” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 5:14 am
Absent a finding that the attorney’s courses of conduct were reasonable as a matter of a law, a determination that a course of conduct constitutes malpractice requires findings of fact (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:54 am
(Katebi v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:38 am
Sound Financial, LLC David Wayne Krumrey Oppenheimer & Co Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Oppenheimer andamp; Co., 637 F.2d 318, 333 (5th Cir. 1981);andnbsp;andnbsp;Dasler v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:52 am
With 34 years in the industry, he also was previously a representative for UBS Financial (UBS), Raymond James & Associates (RJF), First Union Securities, McDonald Investments Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
’” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990], citing Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985].) [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
Imaging Co. v General Bus. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Moreover, the cause of action alleged in the complaint "is premised upon one or more [*3]affirmative, intentional misrepresentations . . . which have caused additional damages, separate and distinct from those generated by the alleged malpractice" (White of Lake George v Bell, 251 AD2d 777, 778; see Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442, 451-452; Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430). [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am
Plaintiff’s presumption that there would be a continuation of the retainer agreement she signed with J&S when Schlesinger moved to MLF is insufficient to raise an issue of fact (See Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484,486 [1 st Dept 2018] citing Pellegrino v Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 49 AD3d 94, 99 [1st Dept 2008] [“a party cannot create the relationship based on his or her own beliefs or actions”]; Jane St. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
Defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) is also denied inasmuch as defendant's affidavit and the documents attached thereto do not definitively and "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted action as a matter of law" (Leon, 84 NY2d at 88); the documentary evidence merely raises numerous issues of fact, rather than finally dispose of them (see Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., P.C., 160 AD2d 428, 435 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Tobacco Securities Trust Co. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am
A claim for legal malpractice can be viable “despite settlement of the underlying action, if it is alleged that the settlement was effectively compelled by [the] mistakes of counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990] [holding settlement of underlying action did not compel dismissal]). [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Oppenheim & Co., 554 N.Y.S.2d 487 (N.Y. [read post]
