Search for: "Order Denying Rehearing"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
The former president is prohibited from denying the sexual assault, which includes denying knowing Carroll. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Fifteen judges dissented from the 9th Circuit’s refusal to rehear the case en banc. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
If he does so, then the automatic stay of the issuance of the mandate will be extended – that stay will dissolve and the mandate must be issued “7 days after entry of an order denying a timely petition for panel rehearing, petition for rehearing en banc, or motion for stay of mandate, whichever is later. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 10:47 pm
Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc in a case challenging its precedent on the (un)reviewability of FEC dismissals of administrative complaints. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit published an amended opinion and order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc, thus upholding its August reversal of the Northern District of California’s dismissal of a qui tam whistleblower action under the False Claims Act (FCA). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit published an amended opinion and order denying rehearing and rehearing en banc, thus upholding its August reversal of the Northern District of California’s dismissal of a qui tam whistleblower action under the False Claims Act (FCA). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:55 am
The relevant rule (DC Circuit Rule 41(a)(1)) says that the court’s mandate must issue 7 days after the time for asking for rehearing (either by the judges who heard the appeal or the full court) expires and, if filed, 7 days after the petition for rehearing is denied. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
" Injunction denied. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:56 am
Not only did the district court deny the motion to dismiss, it also denied the federal government's request to certify the decision for interlocutory review. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 11:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denying rehearing en banc by an 8-to-7 vote, and the dissent therefrom, at this link. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Doe alleges that Snap monitors content in order to "prohibit … explicit content. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm
In a brief unsigned order, without any explanation, the justices denied a request to intervene after two lower courts rejected requests to put the law on hold. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” The court finally denied review on Nov. 20 in six-time relist E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 8:17 am
NB: An earlier version of this article, published on Nov. 10, 2023, incorrectly stated that the Fifth Circuit had agreed to rehear the gerrymandering case; in fact, the court affirmed the gerrymandering decision based on precedent, but ordered a poll regarding a potential en banc hearing to determine whether the judicial precedent complies with Section 2 of the VRA. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit denied rehearing en banc, with seven of the judges expressing their view that the defendant’s legal argument is correct, but voting against rehearing because “[t]his appeal raises an important and recurring issue that should be considered by the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
Over a dissent from the court’s three liberal justices, the justices denied review in Johnson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
The Order denied petitions for rehearing, denied the California Building Industry Association’s request to publish unpublished portions of the Opinion, and slightly modified the lengthy opinion to add a single footnote and revise one sentence. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
The court granted rehearing en banc, but later vacated the order as improvidently granted over the dissents of five judges. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
Three justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch – indicated that they would have denied the Biden administration’s request, calling Friday’s order “unreasoned” and “highly disturbing. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am
In a portion of the opinion added in its order granting the publication requests of respondents, and numerous other nonparty entit [read post]
