Search for: "Otness v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Seal of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Photo credit: Wikipedia) It pays to read those footnotes! [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The municipal bond tax case involves an appeal by Kentucky officials, supported by the National Association of State Treasurers, testing whether the Commerce Clause permits a state tp exe,[t ots pwm state's municipal bonds from income taxes, while taxing income earned onbonds issued elsewhere. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am
United States). 92% of paid petitions that were granted and scheduled for argument during OT10 appeared on our “Petitions to Watch” list (61 out of 66). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:04 pm
The plaintiffs in Del Vecchio v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:01 pm
The issue of related services has resulted in two decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
United States, which considered the separate-sovereigns exception to double jeopardy, Thomas wrote separately “to address the proper role of the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Such claims have been blessed by the United States Supreme Court in Riegel and Lohr.Howard, 2013 WL 1130759, at *6-7 (footnotes and citations omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 10:20 am
Schleicher v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:53 am
The issue of related services has resulted in two decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]