Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 41 - 60
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2008, 2:48 am
Sarbanes-Oxley's section 404, although several years later in time, creates federal disclosure requirements around internal controls and procedures - the same type of systems at issue in Caremark. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
What turned into an extended procedural battle over the power under Sarbanes Oxley to re-instate whistleblowers based on an interim determination took on another dimension last week when the Administrative Review Board reversed the ALJ determination which reinstated former CFO David Welch and held against him on the merits. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 9:46 pm
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (10th Cir., October 17, 2017) (vacating award for Dietz on the merits because Dietz did not reasonably believe Cypress engaged in offenses enumerated in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:57 am
As your report noted, we’re working to eliminate the unnecessary costs of 404 compliance. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 2:26 pm
It seems that everyone in Silicon Valley hates Sarbanes-Oxley â€â [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
Davis (In re Digimarc Corp. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
We’re here to offer you one of our own – our most-read posts in 2014 about executive disputes. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
If you don't tell us what you're looking at, we're never going to know what you're doing! [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
The Second Circuit’s conclusion is consistent with the holding by the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit in In re Digimarc Corp. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 3:24 pm
Sure, it’s easy to blame rising audit fees on Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
25 Jan 2005, 8:28 am
I heard you getting anxious out there after my post on Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:16 am
" Dictionary.com gives: "L recantÄre to sing back, sing again. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:53 am
Now, some seven years after the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, they’re paying him to give it up. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:53 am
Now, some seven years after the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley, they’re paying him to give it up. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:08 pm
If you know about fraud against a government agency and you’re ready to speak up, you can learn more about whistleblower lawsuits at a free, confidential consultation. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm
They're Michael A. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:53 am
No, today, we’re talking about Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Whistleblower Protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Now that the initial wave of Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance is becoming a distant memory and companies are well versed in the regulations, many would assume that organizations would be far along with implementing their comprehensive fraud risk management (FRM) strategies.However, research by Protiviti reveals that a surprisingly high number of companies still have much room for improvement when it comes to evaluating, mitigating and monitoring fraud risk.Executives at Fortune 1000 companies… [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:24 pm
Tyler (Utah, February 22, 2018) (affirming summary judgment in favor of University of Utah Hospital pharmacy employees on Salo's defamation and other claims: defendants acted within the scope of their employment: they were engaged in the type of work they were employed to perform and their actions were not willful) Sarbanes-Oxley Genberg v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:58 am
To put the directors and officer's incentives in everyday terms, suppose you're playing Monopoly and can buy a get out of jail card using somebody else's money. [read post]
