Search for: "P Plaintiff"
Results 41 - 60
of 13,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
P. 56(d) required an identification not just of the discovery plaintiff wanted but why it had not been obtained before and why it might create a genuine issue of material fact. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 4:42 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:48 pm
In a recent order, Judge Leonard P. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:32 am
A copy of the plaintiff’s complaint can be found here. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:12 am
[P]laintiffs must establish that they themselves have suffered injury. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
P. 23(b)(3), a plaintiff’s damages model must survive the same “rigorous analysis” accorded all other aspects of the class certification motion. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 5:53 am
I/P Engine, Inc. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
The Podhurst Orseck, P.A. attorneys included in the LawDragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers are Lea P. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 1:25 pm
The plaintiffs recently filed their opening brief on the merits. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:40 am
Proving that the best time for a plaintiff to accept a Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
Plaintiff Glas-Weld Systems, Inc., filed a patent infringement and unfair competition action against defendants Michael P. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:29 pm
It is unusual, however, for a white plaintiff to succeed in such a claim. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 10:51 am
Jeffrey P. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:37 pm
The court reasoned that the named plaintiffs “have failed to provide any evidence that counsel informed the opt-in [p]laintiffs that they may be potentially liable for a portion of the costs. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:52 am
P. 26(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 11:22 am
P. 23(f)’s 14-day period for requesting permission to appeal class certification orders cannot be equitably tolled. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 7:42 am
P. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:04 am
P. 56(f)-type motion for further discovery and ordered the parties to brief plaintiff’s motion to preclude defendants from arguing non-registration. [read post]
