Search for: "P. Rogers" Results 41 - 60 of 1,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:29 am by centerforartlaw
By Natalie Glitz Grumhaus There are many reasons that a nonprofit foundation may feel the need to dissolve.[1] When James and Charlotte Brooks Foundation decided to fully dissolve in 2015, only five years after its founding in 2010, they donated most of the Brooks’ artwork to a local art museum, the Parrish, as a way to further the Foundation’s purpose as an artist-endowed institution, dedicated to the Long Island arts community.[2] Another organization, the Urban Institute of… [read post]
 The Board emphasized that “[p]ublic statements by employees about the workplace are central to the exercise of employee rights under the [NLRA]. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The copyright lawsuit between the data-software company SAS Institute and its scrappy copycat World Programming has been interesting to follow over the past several years, and the Federal Circuit has now issued a controversial opinion in the case. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 12:21 pm by Justin Levitt
In the California State Bar’s disciplinary action against John Eastman, Eastman has attempted to designate retired Judge Janice Rogers Brown as an expert “regarding her opinion that the California State Bar seems to be moving into unchartered [sic]… Continue reading The post Unchartered territory appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This post comes to us from professors Martijn Cremers at the University of Notre Dame, Lubomir P. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
In an opinion by Senior Judge Rogers, joined by Judge Pillard and Senior Judge Edwards, the D.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Katie Rogers reports for the New York Times. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rogers is a rule of evidence; its goal is to replace the cumbersome, problematic LOC multifactor analysis with a rule that irrebuttably presumes no confusion except in limited circumstances. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Questionable factfinding is a big route of problems in Rogers cases—like district court ignoring criticisms of P’s survey in VIP. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Many of us talk about Rogers in this way as a categorical rule, but the VIP case shows there’s nuance in those cases that can get lost. [read post]