Search for: "P. SMITH"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 7:10 am
From the introduction of Justice Dana Oxley’s opinion for the Court in Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
(Editor’s Note: The statement below is collectively signed by 22 former United Nations Special Rapporteurs and former UN experts in the field of human rights on the situation in Rafah and the obligations of UN Member States.) [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
” Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Along with other accounting manipulation, this contributed to the situation in the UK described by leading analyst Terry Smith: “…much of the apparent growth in profits which had occurred in the 1980s was the result of accounting sleight of hand rather than genuine economic growth…[2]. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:45 am
Regulation Best Interest According to the press release, Thomas P. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
This footnote in Jack Smith’s filing is particularly interesting and important: A sufficient basis for resolving this case would be that, whatever the rule in other contexts not presented here, no immunity attaches to a President’s commission of federal crimes… Continue reading The post Special Counsel Urges Supreme Court to Reject Trump Stay Request to Delay “Election Subversion” Trial on Immunity Grounds, Especially Because It Involves Election Subversion… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
[A reply to Prof. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Recent revelations of evidence gathered by Special Counsel Jack Smith will also help prove the case. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am
Publications Charles P. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Indeed, in his reply brief (at p.19), Trump says in no uncertain terms that “President Trump is not arguing that section 3 is ‘non-self-executing. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
Smith and Ryan K. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
https://protectthewild.substack.com/p/new-animation-end-hare-coursing Recent Extinctions Within the US States & Territories - A cause for concern. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
Morgan Stanley agreed to pay a $35 million penalty to settle the charges, acknowledging violations of the Safeguards and Disposal Rules under Regulation S-P. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 1:22 pm
Kimberly Wehle in Politico: There’s been a lot of attention paid to the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision on Donald Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution for actions taken while president, a judgment that will have big implications for the 2024… Continue reading The post “The ‘Sleeping Giant’ Case that Could Upend Jack Smith’s Prosecution of Trump” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
(Aug. 23, 2023), https://thenewdigest.substack.com/p/judge-raos-unintentional-surrender. [read post]
