Search for: "P. v. Case" Results 41 - 60 of 25,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am by Etienne Farnoux
The second note on Fuites de pétrole et fuite du temps: le point de départ de la prescription en cas de faits dommageables plurilocalisés à effets continus (Oil leaks and the passage of time: the starting point of the limitation period for plurilocal facts with continuous effects) then focuses on the judgement of the UK Supreme Court of May 10th, 2023 in the Jalla v Shell ([2023] UKSC 16) case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:55 am by Frank Cranmer
The significant factor in the present case would be the change of circumstances. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c), and acts like the plant toxin ricin by inhibiting protein synthesis in endothelial and other cells.[17] Shiga toxin is one of the most potent toxins known.[18] In addition to Shiga toxins, E. coli O157:H7 produces numerous other putative virulence factors including proteins, which aid in the attachment and colonization of the bacteria in the intestinal wall and which can lyse red blood cells and liberate iron to help support E.… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Again, plaintiff requests that: “If the Complaint does not satisfy the pleading requirements established by that case, or by other relevant cases, Plaintiff requests the Court’s direction to amend the Complaint accordingly. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
This time the case is not against NanoString (see this post on the lost appeal) but against the US-based company Curio (see this post on the earlier language appeal in this case). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:10 am by Dylan Gibbs
PS: in case you were wondering, you’re now one of 2,100 people subscribed to this newsletter. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
To determine whether an utterance constituted a criminal threat, the case of R v McCraw, 1991 CanLII 49 (SCC) indicated that this determination is a question of law the court further stated, at p.88, that the words: “Must be looked at in the context in which they were spoken or written, in light of the person to whom they were addressed and the circumstances in which they were uttered. [read post]