Search for: "P. v. Floyd"
Results 41 - 60
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
” Lundbeck, for its part, took a narrower view.When reading this part of the judgment, this Kat was reminded of the discussion in Chef America Inc. v Lamb Weston Inc. 358 F.3d 1371 (Fed. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:55 am
Scott, 116 F.3d 137, 140 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1997); Floyd v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:18 pm
In Holland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 8:13 am
Floyd Douglas J. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Floyd, 72 P.3d 820 (Cal. 2003); People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
Slip Op. p. 52. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
This technology was exposed to the light of day in Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd [2010] EWHC 1458 (Pat), a decision of the Patents Court for England and Wales (Mr Justice Floyd) last Friday. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
Olson of Washington, arguing for Citizens United, 30 minutes [some of that time will be saved for rebuttal after all others have argued]; Floyd Abrams of New York, arguing for Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, 10 minutes; Solicitor General Kagan, for the FEC, 30 minutes, and Seth P. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
More unfair advantage, but only where the goods are “luxury” enoughKenzo Tsujimoto v EUIPO, Joined Cases C‑85/16 P and C‑86/16 P, CJEU (May 2018)Kenzo is a French fashion house with Japanese roots. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:45 am
Maria P. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Floyd J had found that the patent as it stood was invalid. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:48 pm
P by Mr & Mrs P v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:55 pm
P by Mr & Mrs P v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
FLOYD MARLAND TYSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The trial decision was recorded on this weblog under the title "Taking the p*** -- or merely retaining it? [read post]
