Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 41 - 60
of 574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2022, 4:24 am
In Dexia Crediop S.P.A. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
Germany and the Nordic countries, unfair competition or marketing law offers wider possibilities for successful legal action in this kind of cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm
Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:23 am
Accessdata Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Airflow Catalyst Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm
Charkaoui, Re, 2007 SCC 9 at para. 53;Ruby v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:21 am
See Austin v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am
Péter Mezei is a full-time faculty of the Szeged Law School (Hungary), where he also functions as Associate Dean for Strategic Affairs. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
The Curia website brings us news of an appeal which has been lodged by Germany’s railway company Deutsche Bahn AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) in Case T-404/09 Deutsche Bahn AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).By way of background: Deutsche Bahn AG had filed a trade mark application for registration of a figurative mark that consisted of a horizontal combination of the colours grey and red and which in… [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
Boehringer manufactures the API in Germany. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THEPREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE(UKRAINE v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The Court, referring to its 2007 Grand Chamber judgment in Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Kamina, V. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
Smith and Robert P. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:20 am
A "quick and dirty" translation of the reasoning of the Advocate General in the LIMONCHELO dispute, Case C- 344/05 P OHIM v Shaker (see earlier post by the IPKat here), comes from Stéphane Ambrosini (Tomkins & Co, Dublin): "24. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 8:54 pm
'Tis the scheduling season for the Ericsson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
Of particular interest here is that part of the opinion and order (with thanks to Adam Savett of Securities Litigation Watch), in which the Court, after presuming and rebutting ABP being the most adequate plaintiff, presumes Union to be the most adequate (from p.13). [read post]
