Search for: "P. v. Shields"
Results 41 - 60
of 734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
” (Id. at p. 13.) [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
” (Id. at p. 13.) [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:45 am
” 497 P. 3d, at 1045. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Ramsey [Lisa P. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:59 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
P. 5.2 and 26(c), if applicable. [read post]
Do Law Schools Truly Have to Worry About Students Not Being Able to Handle Real-World Disagreements?
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am
During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Fagan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
P. 19(a)(l)(B).} [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:04 am
Payment of hire under a time charter The Court then reiterated the following principles applicable to payment of hire: (a) The risk of delay is fundamentally on the charterer who must pay hire unless relieved of the obligation under an off-hire provision (The Eleni P [2019]); (b) An off-hire provision is an exception clause and so a charterer must bring itself within its ambit in order to be excused from payment (The Eleni P); (c) The charterer’s obligation to pay… [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The case before the court, Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
The Department stated: “The United States disagrees with plaintiffs’ unsupported assertion that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to the Vice President in his official capacity as the President of the Senate” (p.4 n. 1 & see also p.6). [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:51 am
Allowing parents to proceed pseudonymously to shield their children's pseudonymity is generally the majority view (see p. 1400 of The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation), though there are some dissenting decisions, see p. 1401 n.230. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
