Search for: "P. v. Smith"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Reardon Smith Line, at p. 574, per Lord Wilberforce) (Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Bato v Cano, 2023 ABCJ 114 [10] I am satisfied that what is commonly referred to as “cock fighting” is illegal in Canada, and while there is ample argument on behalf of the Plaintiff to suggest that this activity is legal in the Philippines, I am not in a position to conclude that. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Bessie Smith’s recording of “Down Hearted Blues” enters the U.S. public domain on January 1, 2024.Effect of the Music Modernization Act on Public Domain for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings The distinction between compositions and recordings is important to remember because these two types of copyrighted works won’t enter the public domain at the same time. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 8:42 pm
Peor aún, el 10 de junio Maqueda le escribe (y hace pública) esta nota, de la que extraemos dos párrafos:Los argentinos han sido sorprendidos por sus declaraciones. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:54 pm
Todos harán su descargo por escrito, menos Vázquez, que comparece [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
Smith, 315 N.C. 76, 100, 337 S.E.2d 833, 849 (1985); accord State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
Smith on July 18, 2023. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
De aquí la sobreactuación del propio Poder Ejecutivo al destacar la valía de la Corte en el caso “Pérez de Smith”. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
The orthodox approach was exemplified in Carnival’s submission that ‘[i]t was not the legislature’s purpose to appoint Australian courts as the global arbiter … of class actions concerning consumer contracts across the world’ (See Respondent’s Outline of Oral Argument, p. 3). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
Cottrol and Brannon P. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:44 am
P. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
Certainly, asking our judges to be respectful to litigants using other general neutral means (such as addressing a party as "Attorney Smith" or "Plaintiff Smith") does not force anyone to violate their beliefs. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
From Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:58 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
In S.B.B. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
On August 21, 2023, S&P also took actions similar to those of Moody’s, downgrading or cutting the ratings on a host of banks, for similar reasons. [read post]
