Search for: "PAT DOE"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 9:31 am
The German Patent Court’s decision The German Patent Court upheld the appeal for ‘perfumery and fragrances’ of the contested trade mark and dismissed it for the other goods and services (case 30 W (pat) 70/21). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 9:18 am
On that basis, the EUIPO and the German Patent Court rejected ‘VROMAGE’ inter alia for ‘imitation cheeses’ (014613368 and 25 W (pat) 552/19). [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Over-the-counter medication typically does not lead to charges for possession, even if someone has it for illicit purposes. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
After a pat‑down search, the officer placed the accused in a police vehicle until the sniffer dog arrived. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
General approach to negotiating licences: Optis Before the hand-down of Unwired Planet (First Instance) [2017] EWHC 2988 (Pat) Optis’ rates were excessive ([193]). [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
UK divergence from the EPO on plausibility (Sandoz v BMS), Part 2: Interpretation of G 2/21Interpretation of G 2/21: Inventive step may be supported solely by post-published data (T 0116/18)G 2/21 does not permit armchair inventing (T 0258/21)Clarity on the interpretation of G2/21 from the referring Board (T 0116/18)Crystallising the interpretation of G 2/21 (T 1989/19)Plausibility in other technical fieldsA common misconception is that G 2/21 is only relevant to the biotech… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:34 am
(“Collegium”) for infringement of US Pat. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:28 am
The Board of Appeal thus concluded:"The earlier application as filed therefore does not contain a pointer to the chosen combination of features. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:56 am
After that time, if a camera does not contain evidence that is valuable in an investigation, the footage will be deleted. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 1:29 am
Particularly, the Board of Appeal did not consider that the fact that one technical effect of an invention was unsurprising, discounted a second unexpected technical effect from being relied on for inventive step: "In situations which do not qualify as a 'one-way street', the Board does not consider it appropriate that a crucial and unexpected technical advantage be disregarded in the assessment of inventive step as soon as any additional obvious effect is mentioned in the… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Cir. 2018) and In re Depomed Pat. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Christopher Kurka violated the ethics law during a visit to the state Capitol by Pat Martin. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
He does not report having a savings account. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:55 am
I am deighted to pass along the announcement of the publication of (Anne Wagner and Sarah Marusek (eds)) Research Handbook on Legal Semiotics (Edward Elgar, 2023). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:30 am
What Does Quiet Cutting Look Like? [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am
I. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:25 am
The EBA does have a habit of rephrasing the questions referred to it in order to avoid issues of general application beyond the facts of the case at hand (G 1/21, IPKat) or of providing self-confessedly vague advice even when it does answer the question (G2/21, IPKat). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
Pat App. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am
Briefly, the judge summarised the principle that where the patentee says in the description that the technical effect identified can be achieved either by means A or B but goes on to claim only means B, this is a clear indication from the patentee that means A does not fall within the scope of the claims, whether as a matter of normal construction or equivalence. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 2:09 pm
How Does a Government Shutdown Affect Government Contracts? [read post]
