Search for: "PATIENT FIRST CORPORATION" Results 41 - 60 of 3,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
  Continue reading The post Cancer Patient Prevails on Workers’ Compensation Claim Against Exxon appeared first on Insurance Dispute Lawyer Blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
  From a corporate practice of medicine standpoint, if a non-MD, non-professional corporation, healthcare venture offers the user X services for Y dollars, it can appear that the venture is steering patient down a specific clinical pathway. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The plaintiffs first argued that the member companies were liable because they breached their duty to provide emergency room protocols for the evaluation and treatment of emergency room patients with cardiac or cardiac-like symptoms. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:00 am
MAYOR BLOOMBERG AND HEALTH AND HOSPITALS PRESIDENT AVILES ANNOUNCE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NATION'S FIRST COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL SIMULATION CENTER TO TRAIN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation is the First Public Hospital System in the Nation to Feature Leading-Edge Training Technology to Improve Clinical Learning, Patient Care and Patient Safety Yesterday, Mayor Michael R. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:39 pm by John Hopkins
  The first case was filed on behalf of a Gulf County, Florida woman who was implanted with the defective Mentor ObTape medical device in 2004. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:49 pm
On the other side is a corporate laboratory with a vested interest in maintaining proprietary control over patient data. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Hopkins
The problem explained in the complaint in detail is that the 608 study results were, first, of a small patient population and, second, the results were substantially manipulated by Pfizer in an effort to cause the study to demonstrate an effectiveness in treating broad categories of fungal infection when it, in fact, was not effective. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Hopkins
The problem explained in the complaint in detail is that the 608 study results were, first, of a small patient population and, second, the results were substantially manipulated by Pfizer in an effort to cause the study to demonstrate an effectiveness in treating broad categories of fungal infection when it, in fact, was not effective. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 4:52 pm by M. Brandon Smith
It was supposed to be the first courtroom battle in the Counrty of patients with the defective ASR hip replacement against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary DePuy Orthopaedics, manufacturer of said hip implant. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
So we’ve only talked about two out of four bullets on the first bucket, which is the examples of the types of behaviors and subtle controls that the corporate practice of medicine doctrine is intended to prevent. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:16 am by John Hopkins
The post Pay Back to Big Corporations — Unneeded Laws appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 7:56 pm by Texas Legal News
The post When Care Fails: A Look into Medical Malpractice and Patient Advocacy appeared first on Rasansky Law Firm. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Karen Terry
The post Elder Care Facilities and Nursing Homes Putting Patients at Risk — Long Before Coronavirus appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Karen Terry
The post Elder Care Facilities and Nursing Homes Putting Patients at Risk — Long Before Coronavirus appeared first on Searcy Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:24 am
The CMA opposes this bill on 5 grounds:1) The ban on corporations practicing medicine is an important protection for patients in California hospitals. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  The post Health Care Fraud Attorney on the Importance of Treating Patients as Individuals with Individual Needs appeared first on San Francisco Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:03 am by Staff
Unlike many other states, California does not give physicians the option of forming a standard C-Corporation or other common professional corporations such as an S-Corporations or an LLC (Limited Liability Corporation). [read post]