Search for: "PEOPLE v. SAMPLE"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 10:17 am
[Cite to Vargas v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 3:25 am
” I accept that I may never see a day when Congress does not turn every budget cycle into a political football and when members of Congress actually work together in a bipartisan manner to pass legislation that benefits the American people. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
This is no surprise since by 2007 only 66% of clinical labs screened all stool samples for E. coli O157:H7 and fewer than 10% of labs ever conducted on-site testing for non-O157 STEC. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
These searches are becoming increasingly common as a component of forensic genetic genealogy investigations, and EFF has long argued they violate people’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:50 am
Gunaratna v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
If they proposed some Huawei v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
Appellate Court Case Not Originating with Appeals Board People, The v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
When examining whether mass surveillance measures are necessary and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights has focused its review on whether appropriate safeguards against government abuse exist.While the Court has not recently carried out a balancing exercise between the benefits sought by mass surveillance and its impact on society, the Grand Chamber judgment from S. and Marper v. the U.K., a case in which the Court found unanimously that the collection and… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:32 am
The court says the 32/58 video comparison was too small a sample to generate reliable results. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:56 pm
EPA, and—most recently—Biden v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Social Media People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
You’d want a big sample or a representative sample to make such a claim, but no one has such a sample. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm
Other solutions: statutory license for sampling. [read post]
