Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 41 - 60
of 398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Supreme Court's decision in Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenant's Association v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:01 am
UCC 3-804 allows one to maintain an action as a “holder” on a promissory note even though the instrument has been lost or destroyed. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
The Background The pursuer, Mr Campbell, was employed as an apprentice joiner by Peter Gordon Joiners Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Holder, 130 S. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
Peter E. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:24 am
Bicks's background I now venture to guess that he will probably be the lead trial counsel.Here's the case management order: 15-07-31 Oracle v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am
Peter Tochtermann. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:11 pm
Copyright is not just for the benefit of copyright holders, and neither is the Copyright Office. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:39 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:07 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
Bluman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 7:44 am
The decision in Panasonic v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:04 am
In the most recent one, EMI v UPC last October, Mr Justice Peter Charleton decided that he could not grant an injunction restraining UPC from making available to the public sound recordings which infringed copyright. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:21 am
In IPCom v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 12:31 am
Peter Tochtermann) over EP3547772 on "data transmission method and apparatus"Munich I Regional Court:Case no. 7 O 11301/231 (Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:14 pm
The parties to the Authors’ Guild et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:06 pm
Supreme Court orders rebriefing in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Holder, the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm
Holder (Attorney General), et al. (10-545). [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
Kat Friend Xi Lin provided her comments on Jin Yong v. [read post]
