Search for: "PIPES v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2020, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ulma Piping USA Corp., 2020 WL 598284, No. 4:17-CV-01400 (S.D. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
In 2000 Mance L.J. said in Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland: “Copyright does not lie on the same continuum as, nor is it the antithesis of, freedom of expression. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
No. 337-TA-718 Certain Electronic Paper Towel Dispensing Devices and Components Thereof (ITC 337 Update) Louis Vuitton – LV files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Handbags (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) Radiodetection – ALJ Bullock grants motion to terminate investigation in Certain Underground Cable and Pipe Locators (337-TA-727) (ITC Law Blog) SEB – Amicus briefs for Global-Tech v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Check out ADR Prof Blog's take on this article from here.Another article deals with the validity of religious arbitrations in USA and UK. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Cadbury Adams USA LLC (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) State Tort claim preempted by patent claim where pleading of bad faith did not meet Iqbal standards: Viskase Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm by Pamela Wolf
Other cases of interest to labor and employment practitioners include: M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Ronald Mann
From that perspective, the briefs in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(China Law Blog) Europe ECJ issues preliminary ruling in L’Oreal/Bellure regarding whether imitation perfumes were protected as permissible comparative advertising (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: Proof of trade mark use: Harwin International LLC v OHIM, Cuadrado SA (IPKat) CFI: Last minute reprieve for passing off: Last Minute Network v OHIM-Last Minute Tour (IPKat) CFI dismisses Korsch’s appeal against refusal to grant CTM for ‘PharmaResearch’ due… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]