Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 12:06 pm
My prior chart in 2009 showed a totally different trend (also less precise markers). [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm
I previously posted on the Seventh Circuit's opinion reversing class certification in Kartman v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 2:33 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 10:19 pm
Congress had spoken to the precise issue—whether HSS could vary rates among hospitals when it used Option 2 to set reimbursement rates—and said “No. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 7:43 am
Two review standards are used by the courts that hear these cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The Third Circuit issued a precedential decision in Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The Third Circuit issued a precedential decision in Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The Third Circuit issued a precedential decision in Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am
By enforcing their patents, owners of SEPs could, if they wished, use the patent enforcement system to ‘hold up’ or prevent competitors from launching rival products that use the same standards. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:08 am
IJR used the Photo for precisely the same reason: to depict ‘The Nuge.'” The court also says the photo use was commercial. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:50 am
FTC and Broadcom v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
We can talk about the proper royalty base (or damages base, to be precise) again in the build-up to next year's fourth Apple v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:34 pm
My contribution to the con law professor roundtable I blogged about here consisted of a short piece that considered Citizens United, US v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
In Coalition of Battery Recyclers Association v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
All of these lower-court opinions could provide useful guidance in the event the Supreme Court must revisit Bush v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:52 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of OregonOpinion Date: 4/28/09Cite: Precision Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
The court quoted Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:33 pm
Another good example is that controversial Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:26 am
That said, the term "computer software" does not meet the standard. [read post]
