Search for: "Pacee v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:34 pm
In response, policyholders have argued (with varying degrees of success from state to state) that public policy concerns are the properly left to the legislative branch. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
However, reaching this milestone and the overall constructive tone conveyed by Member States at last week’s SOTF Ministerial Meeting belies three underlying fault-lines that must be navigated skillfully to achieve meaningful progress, namely: renewed Great Power rivalries, resurfaced Global North-South tensions, and lingering distrust between certain Member States with the U.N. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
As stated by the ASIC chair, “… greenhushing is… just another form of greenwashing, and risks misleading by omission. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
DLA Piper made a summary of the hearings, with six take aways, including points such as ‘it seems that the UPC will handle PI cases with the pace that we know from national (e.g. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
DLA Piper made a summary of the hearings, with six take aways, including points such as ‘it seems that the UPC will handle PI cases with the pace that we know from national (e.g. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
" (Ibid., ¶30 iii - v). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 8:11 am
Judge McAfee captioned his order as “State of Georgia v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This is even more relevant considering the pace at which Indian companies are growing, and their increased trade and cooperation with UK companies, which exposes them to potential investigations by the relevant UK authorities. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The decision states "DOH's evidence showed the petitioner feeding the patient heaping spoonfuls of food at a rapid pace and in an extremely rough manner, not allowing the patient sufficient time to swallow. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The decision states "DOH's evidence showed the petitioner feeding the patient heaping spoonfuls of food at a rapid pace and in an extremely rough manner, not allowing the patient sufficient time to swallow. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]