Search for: "Page v. Carlson" Results 41 - 60 of 76
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
The Court's Decision:  The key holding of Justice Carlson's 27 page opinion is this language on page 14: Patterson is correct in her assertion that lack of consensus among sources does not automatically render an expert inadmissible. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Quickly summarizing the tragic facts of this case and deftly dismissing the seeming tension with Carlson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm by Anna Christensen
  Finally, Justice Stevens observed that, in Carlson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am by Anna Christensen
  On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed, relying on Carlson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
Lambert, Jeffrey Schafer, Brent Brevik, Chris Lang, Debbie Schleusner, DeAnna Brink, John Larson, Gregory Schmidt, Carolyn Agin Brown,… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Austinuts, Oppositions Nos. 91166551 and 91166552 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the marks AUSTINUTS in standard character and design form, for nuts, in view of the mark AUSTIN, in standard character and design form, for crackers and cookies, including crackers with peanut butter].April 30, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Interactive Media Communications, Serial No. 76668415 [Appeal from requirement for disclaimer of the term "strippersociety.com" in the mark shown below [but in black and… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:09 pm
On Wednesday, the appeals judges tossed out Coar's reasoning. * * * Although the opinion set a precedent that Hollander said will be considered in similar cases across the country, it did not definitively resolve Hall's lawsuit. * * * With Coar's decision out of the way, Hall still must convince a jury that her infertility treatments were the true reason for her firing, which Nalco denies.The 11-page 7th Circuit ruling in the ND Illinois case of Hall, Cheryl v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
Passman, 1979), and cruel and unusual punishment by federal prison officials (Carlson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
Barbara Carlson and David Carlson, a 9-page opinion, the question is whether service of process was adequate. [read post]