Search for: "Paine v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm by Mac
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:02 am by The Federalist Society
Rees is applicable when states are using a different execution protocol than the one involved in Baze v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am by Josh Blackman
And, all agree that the risk of pain from a firing squad is far less  than the risk of pain from lethal injection. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
  This state-of-the-art issue is critical in the Pain Pump litigation and this appellate decision certainly tightens the binds on plaintiffs who had earlier pain pump surgeries. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:46 am by Bexis
Although we aren't familiar with all the details, we know that state of the art - that is when a particular risk was scientifically knowable - is currently a big deal in Pain Pump litigation. [read post]