Search for: "Parker v. Holder"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm
The Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm
The Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:33 pm
Oak Park Calabasas Homeowners Association (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 1031 and Parker v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 11:58 am
I first saw the news about Thursday’s decision affirming fair use in the Authors Guild v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm
See also Parker v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:35 am
Ross, BP v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), in which the Court held that eminent domain in the redevelopment context would be reviewed as social legislation, and Hawaii Hous. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:19 am
International Value Advisers, LLC, May 20, 2020, Parker, B., and Rubenstein v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
If the Court followed the interpretation of Article 8(2) as advanced by Constantin Film, it would upset “the balance that was struck by the EU legislature in such a way as to favour the interests of holders of intellectual property rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
An earlier iteration of the case was GVR’d and returned to the Sixth Circuit in light of the Court’s per curiam decision in Parker v. [read post]
ANTI-GUNS-ON-CAMPUS BLOWBACK: You know, I raised this issue with a Faculty Senate colleague and was…
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm
Holders of concealed carry permits in the U.S. are arrested for violent crimes at a rate five times lower than non-license holders (even lower than police officers in many states). [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 5:09 pm
Supreme Court’s March 24, 2015 opinion in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:25 am
My feeling is this point at least might well be appealed successfully - especially following the Advocate General's opinion in Scarlet v SABAM only a few days ago, where the reasoning is strongly against the legality of blanket filtering and monitoring to protect copyright, since invasion of personal data privacy is inevitable. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
Parker, 182 S.W.2d 397 (Tex. 1944)). [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
Parker v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Parker v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
; Wherley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Holder dealt in part with the effect of the Copyright Act of 1790. [read post]
