Search for: "Parks v. Planning & Zoning Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 4:41 am
Town Plan and Zoning Commission of the Town of Fairfield, 2019 WL 3773931 (CT App. 8/13/2019) [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
(See National Park Hospitality Assn. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
The Court examined the plain language of the mini-dorm ordinance and held that the Planning Commission crafted the ordinance to be interpreted as broadly as possible. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
These approvals included a CUP, a (later withdrawn) zoning variance for parking over 750 feet from the site, and a rear yard setback adjustment. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:59 am
Friends of McMillan Park v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:59 am
Grays Hill Baptist Church v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 7:49 pm
Friends of McMillan Park v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:53 am
The Development Department issued a favorable report, but the Planning Commission rejected Coles’ applications after hearing from two community members who expressed concern about parking and the effect the bikini bar would have on development in the neighborhood. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
The Court examined the plain language of the mini-dorm ordinance and held that the Planning Commission crafted the ordinance to be interpreted as broadly as possible. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
” (Citing San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
The City Attorney advised that because no CUP was required, the Commission was required to approve the project if it met design review criteria, and that it could not consider use-related issues such as parking, traffic, safety and soil remediation. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
Hoy comienza el plan para apoyar a los damnificados de los sismos con trabajo, vivienda y servicios públicos . [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:22 pm
The Zoning Board of Appeals found that plaintiff’s plans to develop a restaurant and a hotel within a previously-established business park were consistent with the GEIS and Finding Statement. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
In 2009, Pulte submitted its Water and Sewer Category Change Request application for review by the County and the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, but no action was taken. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
The Commission approved t [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
” (CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(b), (c); National Parks & Conservation Assn. v. [read post]
