Search for: "Parks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 41 - 60
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
The National Park Service regulation implementing this statute includes the following exemption to a general ban on weapons in National Parks. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
Berryhill (Nov. 7) – Whether, when the Social Security Act provides that a court can award attorney’s fees “not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled,” the 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Social Security Administration, 796 F.2d 576, 580 (1st Cir. 1986). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:35 am
State of Oklahoma (Gaming – Arbitration Award) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html In the Culture & Tradition section, we feature an article about the Transportation Security Administration’s commitment to improve respectful handling of Native American sacred objects. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:43 pm
After he had handed over his license, paperwork, address and phone number, Case was questioned as to whether he knew anything about Ronald Case and was asked to provide his social security number. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Judge Hamilton's decision and recommendation is set out below: NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEP’T OF SOCIAL SERVICES (DEP’T OF HOMELESS SERVICES) Petitioner - against - VICTORIA MCCAIN Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIFFANY HAMILTON, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Homeless Services within the Department of Social Services (“DHS”), brought this employee… [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
Judge Hamilton's decision and recommendation is set out below: NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEP’T OF SOCIAL SERVICES (DEP’T OF HOMELESS SERVICES) Petitioner - against - VICTORIA MCCAIN Respondent REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIFFANY HAMILTON, Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Department of Homeless Services within the Department of Social Services (“DHS”), brought this employee… [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
So long as the bank account is in their name and uses one of their social security numbers, it won’t create a problem with my government benefits. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
The police informed the local council social services department. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:29 am
The appeals court noted for the sake of completeness that, unlike the VA, the Social Security Administration will cut of disability benefits to a person deemed disabled if he or she obtains “substantial gainful employment. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am
April Doss examined the Trump administration’s proposals to examine the social media accounts of visitors to the United States. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
Internet and Social Media Twitter has launched a browser game designed to teach users about its privacy settings. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
The Comptroller discounted Petitioner's experts opinions for various reasons and rejected Petitioner's citing determinations made by the Workers' Compensation Board and the Social Security Administration, explaining that the opinions of those entities "are not binding upon the Comptroller. [read post]
