Search for: "Patent Construction Systems" Results 41 - 60 of 2,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 9:30 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 9,361,658 is owned by Mantissa Corporation and is titled “System and Method for Enhanced Protection and Control Over the Use of Identity. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:30 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 9,361,658 is owned by Mantissa Corporation and is titled “System and Method for Enhanced Protection and Control Over the Use of Identity. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by USPTO
That said, if an individual made a signification contribution through the construction of a prompt, that could be sufficient. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
Consequently, an AI system cannot be named as the inventor on a patent application, even if it was instrumental in developing the claimed invention. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
What emerges is an irony that is even more ironic because it is un-conscious, that our construction of AI, including its regulatory and instrumental operative characteristics, is merely a reflection of the larger ideologies that shape the meaning and desires and operating systems of the political cultures within which it resides. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision vacating and remanding a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision that a patent for a climate control system was not proven unpatentable by Google LLC and Ecobee, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision vacating and remanding a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision that a patent for a climate control system was not proven unpatentable by Google LLC and Ecobee, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:15 am by Roy Wepner
For decades, patent litigators have followed what can best be described as a forced march seeking to construe patent terms and thereafter litigate infringement and/or validity issues based on those constructions. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:15 am by Roy Wepner
For decades, patent litigators have followed what can best be described as a forced march seeking to construe patent terms and thereafter litigate infringement and/or validity issues based on those constructions. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Agencies can scrutinize material to discover infringing products before put into use in public funded construction projects. [read post]
The following instances provide a glimpse into how SEPs are not just theoretical constructs but can be active contributors to environmental sustainability. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:03 am by Holly
The ALJ rejected this notion as a matter of plain meaning claim construction. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The reasons for the firm’s actions included rising deposit costs and risks to commercial property and construction loans posed by changes to the commercial real estate market brought about by shifts to remote work during the pandemic. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jordan Duenckel
The district court issued a claim construction order construing “barcode,” relying on statements K-fee made distinguishing certain prior art (Jarisch) during prosecution of a related European patent before the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in K-fee System GmbH v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 10:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in K-fee System GmbH v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:13 am by Dennis Crouch
All four patents relate to mobile communication systems involving base stations that can be mounted on moving vehicles. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:51 am by Myles Jelf (Bristows)
Back in the days before 0 BC (before UPC commencement), we thought the battle might be between patentees wanting to bifurcate to give them greater freedom on construction issues, and defendants wanting to keep them honest (and judges wanting to make the system more efficient and coherent). [read post]