Search for: "Patrick v. Board of Review"
Results 41 - 60
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am
LSI Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Florio v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Lynch etc., et al., Petitioners-Appellants, vNew York City Civilian Complaint Review Board et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Lynch etc., et al., Petitioners-Appellants, vNew York City Civilian Complaint Review Board et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Hacked Off Board Director Emma Jones said that the sexist Rayner article reflects a “cultural problem” which cannot be fixed with tokenistic punishments of the journalist. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
IPSO 09771-19 Reynolds v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 09940-21 Louise Hough v dailypost.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2019), 5 Reporting suicide (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09942-21 Louise Hough v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2019), 5 Reporting suicide (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after… [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
The Ontario Municipal Board rejected a challenge to the conclusion the report reached and the Divisional Court dismissed an application for judicial review. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:35 am
In Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:43 pm
As reported previously, the bill would essentially end discretionary denial practice under precedential Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases such as Apple Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
