Search for: "Patrick v. Patrick" Results 41 - 60 of 3,978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 6:37 pm by Howard Bashman
And in commentary, in Tuesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Anya Bidwell and Patrick Jaicomo will have an op-ed titled “When Local Officials Gag Dissenters With Handcuffs; In Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by Olivier Moréteau
Patrick Glenn applied to explain ‘com-paring’ by describing it as ‘an enduring process of peaceful co-existence (in spite of difference in spite of potential conflict), in a way which ensures not uniformity but ongoing diversity’. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385;  R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Friday morning read: Biden admonishes the Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am by Reference Staff
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Accordingly, in making these statements, [Patrick] discriminated against the applicant on the bases of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin and ethnic origin, contrary to the Code”. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Accordingly, in making these statements, [Patrick] discriminated against the applicant on the bases of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin and ethnic origin, contrary to the Code”. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]