Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 41 - 60 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
To opine on the subject would be to “disregard the constitutional duties that are the specific responsibility of other branches of government,” namely, Congress and the president. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Howard Friedman
The judiciary, no less than the other branches of State and Federal Government, must respect people’s fundamental rights, and among these are the right to the free exercise of religion and the right to the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am by Will Baude
  Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
While SL now claimed that she had been too embarrassed to file a report with respect to the incident, she had also testified that she had immediately reported the slip and fall to the manager of the Brampton branch where the fall occurred. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
While SL now claimed that she had been too embarrassed to file a report with respect to the incident, she had also testified that she had immediately reported the slip and fall to the manager of the Brampton branch where the fall occurred. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]