Search for: "People of the State of California v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 5:10 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm
Prop. 57 was dishonestly sold to the people as a measure for "nonviolent offenders," but it includes people with violent records whose present offense of conviction is "nonviolent. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:15 pm
Here are the materials in People of the State of California v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
People fear crime. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
California already bars anyone on a state payroll (including yours truly, who teaches at UC Berkeley) from getting reimbursed for travel to states that discriminate against LGBTQ+ people. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
"And, with similar, but more alarming, sentiment, the dissent by Judge Staton, sitting by designation from the Central District of California:"In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward calamity. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
by Clark Taylor In Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
In the case Fisher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
Ruling jointly along with United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
The decision in State of California ex rel Bartlett v Miller is helpful precedent that keeps the door open to such outsider whistleblowers. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:02 am
The United States Department of Justice has done today what media reports indicated yesterday: the DOJ, together with the attorneys general (AGs) of eight states (in alphabetical order: California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Virginia) filed an antitrust lawsuit over Google's ad tech. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
On appeal, defendants argue that the State of California cannot regulate defendants’ sale of cigarettes to non-Indians because defendants are operating stores located on trust lands held by the United States for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (the Band), a federally-recognized tribe. [read post]
